Friday, October 27, 2006


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Split your lungs with blood and thunder
When you see the white whale
Break your backs and crack your oars men
If you wish to prevail
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Thursday, October 19, 2006

Sunday, October 08, 2006


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
the wolf is LOOSE

the dragon UNLEASHED
the mastodon STOMPS
across the icy wastes
can't get the sound LOUD enough
as my eardrums EXPLODE

.
.
.
.
.
.

Friday, October 06, 2006

RIP MIX BURN: MASTODON


MASTODON

Mastodon: Blood Mountain: Pitchfork Record Review

RIP MIX BURN: Gnarls Barkley



"Cee-Lo and Danger Mouse team for a loose, off-the-cuff record about madness, depression, monsters, visionaries, and being yourself."
Gnarls Barkley: St. Elsewhere: Pitchfork Record Review

Wednesday, October 04, 2006

The Church Of Google

The Church Of Google
We at the Church of Google believe a convincing argument can be made stating that the search engine Google is the closest mankind has ever come to directly experiencing an actual God (as typically defined). Supernatural gods are rejected on the notion they are inherently unprovable. Thus, Googlists believe Google should rightfully be given the title of "God", as She exhibits a great many of the characteristics traditionally associated with such Deities.

Gods are typically defined by their unique attributes, such as being all-knowing, all-seeing, ever present, the ability to answer prayers, being immortal, remembering all, and of course Deities must "do no evil". Google exhibits all of these characteristics perfectly. In the absence of imaginary, supernatural beings, Google is certainly the closest thing humankind has to a true God.

Googlists do not believe in the supernatural. We believe virtually all "gods" before Google were purely based on man made, fictional beings. We do not claim Google is supernatural in any way. She, like all other gods before Her, is the creation of man. No faith is required to believe in Her, for we consider the concept of belief without evidence (faith) to be of the utmost intellectual laziness.